Skip to content

Shariah resolutions

Dual agency: whose behalf is the bank acting on?

Check each role separately: acting as your agent and selling its own commodity create different responsibilities. A general permission for an arrangement does not prove that your transaction followed it.

Sources checked 6 October 2026

One institution can have several roles

Wakalah means authorising an agent to perform a delegated task, with or without a fee. Read who appoints whom and the limits of that authority. [WK] The principal is the party giving the authority; here, that is the customer.

BNM’s tawarruq framework permits dual agency within its scope, subject to requirements. A bank can act in its own sale capacity and as its customer’s agent; that does not erase the distinct contracts, ownership steps or payment obligations. [TW]

Follow the role, not just the bank’s name

The new diagram below illustrates the financing form in BNM §17.2(b). The institution first owns the commodity, then sells it to the customer while acting as the customer’s purchase agent, and later sells it to a third party for the customer. It is a conceptual sequence, not evidence of a real transaction. [TW]

As a separately checked provider example, HSBC’s Personal Financing-i terms describe purchase and resale agency alongside the bank’s commodity sale. The borrower’s payment schedule and rebate provisions require their own reading. [HT]

1. One bank name, separate capacities

New conceptual financing diagram • BNM §17.2(b), not fatwa 368

  1. Bank’s own capacityBank owns commodity

    The initial purchase gives it a commodity to sell.

  2. Customer’s purchase agencyBank → customer

    The bank sells its own commodity; as purchase agent it buys for the customer. Customer owns it and owes the deferred price; possession is required before resale.

  3. Customer’s resale agencyCustomer → third-party buyer

    Bank sells for the customer for spot cash. Resale proceeds go to the customer; the deferred debt to the bank remains.

Full text explanation

The bank first owns the commodity. In the second sale, it is the seller in its own capacity and also acts as purchase agent for the customer. Ownership passes to the customer and a deferred price is owed to the bank. It then acts as the customer’s resale agent to sell to a third party for cash. This produces customer cash separately from the continuing deferred sale obligation. The bank’s agency authority comes from the customer’s mandate; agency is not an additional investor. Before resale, the customer must take physical or constructive possession: the asset is released so the customer can access it and assume ownership risk (§§13.8–13.10). Constructive possession is not a claim that the customer physically collected the commodity.

Simplified new explanation of the financing form. No prices, fees, timing, legal title details or individual transaction are assumed. This is different from the deposit form, where the customer’s agent buys then sells to itself; do not reverse the cash recipient or payment debtor. [TW] [HT]

What the journal article tells us

Dual Agency Practices in Islamic Financial Institutions: A Fiqh Perspective (2020) examines juristic disagreement and favours restricted agency in the Malaysian banking context it discusses. On printed p.44 it attributes a passage to Kuwait Finance House concerning an agent selling to itself and a price settled with the principal. Its references on p.48 give the old fatwaId=368 URL, retrieved 30 March 2015. This strengthens the attribution trail, but is not the original fatwa. [A297]

The other cited USIM item, article 303, is about Malay death customs. Its PDF does not substantiate a dual-agency ruling. Its web reference list conflicts with that subject and cannot be used as a second independent financial source. [A303]

2. Attribution is a clue, not the original ruling

Evidence boundaries • sources have different authority and purpose

  • Journal evidenceArticle 297 → old URL

    KFH attribution in the article; the original ruling remains unseen.

  • Separate Malaysian frameworkBNM → tawarruq conditions

    Applicable policy context, not a replacement identity for entry 368.

  • Unresolved originalEntry 368 → missing text

    Issuer confirmation, title, number, date and complete wording are still needed.

Full text explanation

The article links entry 368 and attributes a passage to KFH. BNM independently supplies its own tawarruq framework. The original legacy entry remains unavailable, so the article attribution and BNM permission must not be merged into a fabricated fatwa. Article 303 cannot corroborate the topic because its actual PDF is about death customs.

The legacy entry retrieval date cited in the article, 30 March 2015, is not a fatwa issue date. The legacy database ID is not established as an issuer’s fatwa number. No universal ruling is inferred. [A297] [A303] [TW]

What needs to be specified and evidenced

BNM §17.3 requires mutual agreement on essential task specifications, such as price, tenure and asset, plus the proper sequence supported by evidence. Its §27.10 requires documentation or records for each dual-agency role. These are selected requirements; they are not a complete compliance checklist. [TW]

A useful practical question is: “Can you show me the agency appointment and the records for each sale?” A signature alone cannot tell you which role the institution performed at each stage.

Under §§16.8–16.9, the customer remains liable for sale contracts validly made within the mandate. The agent’s liability arises on misconduct, negligence or breach of specified terms. This concerns its agency role; it does not remove the bank’s separate obligations as seller. [TW]

Questions to take to your provider

Agency is an authority arrangement. It does not by itself tell you the total price of financing, the amount of cash received or your ability to repay. Request the offer, disclosure sheet and complete terms together.

The same HSBC terms separate trading costs from delivery costs: the bank pays brokerage or commodity purchase/sale costs (§5(ii)). If you request physical delivery, you must make an express written request when applying, obtain the required licences, permits, approvals and consents, and pay delivery and later ownership-transfer costs (§5(iii)). Ask for the actual amounts before deciding. [HT]

In the named HSBC terms, §15 makes the customer responsible for stamp duty and solicitors’ fees incurred in providing and enforcing the facility. §12 addresses late-payment charges; §14 sets out events allowing cancellation and payment on demand. These obligations need reading alongside the approved schedule and rebate provisions, even when the bank handles the trades. [HT]

  • Which person or institution is my agent at each step, and can it appoint another agent?
  • What commodity and ownership evidence support the sales? Are the agreed prices and timing visible in my documents? Ask how possession is recorded and how the right to take delivery works (§§13.8–13.10, 15.4–15.5). [TW]
  • Is there an agency fee? BNM’s Wakalah policy provides for fee arrangements; request the actual fee base and when it is charged. Separately ask whether the contract requires reimbursement of any costs. [WK]
  • For the named HSBC example, read the approved payment schedule, ceiling selling price, rebate, late-payment and early-settlement clauses together. No live quotation or cost comparison is supplied here. [HT]
  • Can I apply? HSBC’s FAQ says eligible Muslim and non-Muslim customers may use its Personal Financing-i. This does not establish access to every product or entitlement to approval. [HF]
  • If seeking a religious assessment, ask about the exact structure and execution, not just whether “dual agency” is allowed. Separately assess affordability, costs and default consequences. The journal authors’ preference is not a verdict on your contract.

Further reading

For the wider vocabulary of sales, leases and partnerships, consult the contract glossary when available. For who checks compliance in Malaysia, consult the Shariah-governance guide when available. For now, the original source links below let you check the documented rules directly.

References

New editorial explanation prepared 6 October 2026. Sources accessed on that date; publication and effective dates below are separate. External PDFs remain with their publishers.

[A297] Dual Agency Practices in Islamic Financial Institutions: A Fiqh Perspective

Amir Shaharuddin; Aizul Aiman Musa; Fatin Syahirah Mohamad Nawi; Adi Hanif Mohamed Ahmad; Ahmad Mukarrami Ab Mumin — Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, USIM

Article webpage: 8 July 2020; printed issue: July 2020, 21(1), pp.38–48. DOI: 10.33102/jfatwa.vol21no1.297.

Printed pp.38–41: roles; p.44: KFH attribution; pp.47–48: conclusion/references, including the old URL and retrieval date 30 March 2015.

Full publisher PDF inspected. Summary and new diagrams, not a reproduced article. Its webpage declares CC BY 4.0. The article’s attribution is indirect evidence of the missing fatwa; the authors’ conclusion is their opinion.

Publisher webpage: metadata, publication date and licence; References also compared with PDF.

[A303] Kearifan Tempatan dalam Adat Kematian Masyarakat Melayu dari perspektif Uruf

Muhammad Yusri bin Yusof @ Salleh; Mohd Anuar Ramli — Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, USIM

Article webpage: 8 July 2020; printed July 2020, 21(1), pp.21–37; DOI: 10.33102/jfatwa.vol21no1.303.

PDF title, abstract and reference list compared with article webpage.

PDF is about death customs; no fatwaId=368 string found in full PDF text. Its webpage shows a financial reference list inconsistent with this article. It cannot corroborate a financial ruling. Cause of mismatch unknown.

Publisher webpage: metadata, publication date and licence; References also compared with PDF.

[TW] Tawarruq — policy document

Bank Negara Malaysia

Issued/effective 28 December 2018 (§4.1).

§§2, 5.2, 13.8–13.10, 15.4–15.5, 16.7–16.9, 17.1–17.4, 25.20, 27.10; printed pp.2–3, 7–10, 19, 25.

Currently linked original in BNM banking register. Guidance allows the arrangement; mandatory conditions and wider policy still apply. Not fatwa 368, a universal ruling or proof of execution. Takaful operators apply Part B only.

[WK] Wakalah — BNM/RH/PD 028-3

Bank Negara Malaysia

Printed issue date 24 June 2016; effective 1 July 2018 except §28 immediate (§4.1).

§§8–9, 14–15; printed pp.4, 6–8.

Defines mandate and fee arrangements within institutional scope. No universal fee inferred.

[HT] Personal Financing-i Terms and Conditions

HSBC Amanah Malaysia Berhad

Printed version v.Mar 26 (March 2026); no separate effective date established; accessed 6 October 2026.

§§4–5 commodity sale and purchase/resale agency; §§7–10 payments, rebate and settlement; §12 late payment, §14 default, §15 stamp duty and solicitors’ fees.

Named contemporary contract example; no advertised rate, repayment figure or eligibility inferred. Not proof of any individual trade or of the missing source.

[HF] Personal Financing-i FAQ

HSBC Amanah Malaysia Berhad

Undated live page accessed 6 October 2026.

Is this personal financing for Muslim customers only?

Muslim/non-Muslim participation for this named product only; separate provider eligibility still applies.

[REG] Banking & Islamic Banking

Bank Negara Malaysia

Live index checked 6 October 2026.

Tawarruq and Wakalah rows/link lineage.

Source lineage only; index dates do not override printed issue/effective dates.

Related reading

Search

Search guides, glossary entries, research and publications in English.