Skip to content
ISRA.my
ENBM
Menu
Islamic finance concepts for everyday life

Research

Modern Collateral Instruments and Underlying Assets for Collateral: A Sharīʿah Compatibility Analysis

Security is an extra layer of rights supporting an obligation. This 2018 report helps you ask what is pledged and how modern security arrangements compare with rahn. Use its dated research findings alongside the actual contract and applicable current requirements.

Sources checked 6 October 2026

Security and collateral in Islamic financing

Use it to understand why an Islamic financing facility may still require security, and why a charge over a changing pool of assets raises different questions from a pledge of one asset. The report compares legal security arrangements with Islamic security concepts; it does not approve your own financing or decide a present dispute. 2018 report: public repository abstract

For an everyday reader, separate three questions: what payment do I owe, what asset or right secures it, and what can happen if I cannot pay? A document called “Islamic financing” does not answer those questions by itself.

Figure 1 · Source-based concept map

Security supports an obligation

Rahn: the supporting contract

  1. Obligor owes an obligationThe person owing the debt may differ from the asset owner.
  2. Owner pledges collateral to the creditorThe security supports fulfilment if the obligor defaults.

Fixed and floating charges

  1. Fixed charge → closer comparison with rahnResearchers find substantial similarities.
  2. Floating charge → changing assetsResearchers favour a Mālikī approach; they note majority-jurist objections and asset-compliance risk.

Quasi-security → different comparisons

  1. Guarantee or indemnity; assignmentThe abstract compares some with kafālah/ḍamān and ḥawālah.
  2. Comparable is not identicalDo not treat a guarantee, an assignment and an asset pledge as the same contract.
Read the full diagram explanation
  1. Rahn involves a pledgor, collateral, a creditor and an obligor’s obligation. The obligor and asset owner need not be the same person.
  2. The 2018 researchers compare fixed charges more closely with traditional rahn. For floating charges they prefer a Mālikī approach but record majority-jurist objections and changing-asset risk.
  3. Some quasi-security arrangements are compared with guarantee and transfer concepts. The abstract explicitly avoids exact equivalence.
The top-level roles use BNM §8.1. The three comparisons below condense the 2018 abstract; they are not three approved products. 2018 report: public repository abstract · Rahn policy document

Report details and abstract access

The repository credits Engku Rabiah Adawiah; Aiman @ Nariman Mohd. Sulaiman; Muhamad Nasir Haron; and Syaza Jamilah ’Inani Jaafar. Its citation identifies a 2018 research report published by the International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance (ISRA), Kuala Lumpur. Names above follow the repository’s author fields, without adding qualifications or present affiliations. 2018 report: public repository abstract

The public abstract describes legal doctrinal comparison and a focus-group discussion held at INCEIF on 19 September 2017 with 25 participants. We read that abstract, not the restricted full PDF. A complete contents list, exact edition, ISBN and publication day remain unverified. 2018 report: public repository abstract

Figure 2 · Evidence and context map

Dates that answer different questions

2018 · Research

  1. What is supportedOriginal identity and public abstract conclusions.
  2. What is missingRestricted full report; edition and exact day unverified.

2018 → 2019 · Regulation

  1. 18 July 2018 · Printed policy issuanceBNM/RH/PD 028-79; register/announcement dated 19 July 2018.
  2. 1 August 2019 · Generally effective§33 submission requirement effective immediately on issuance.

2019 → 2026 · Access history

  1. 17 December 2019 · Repository deposit/updateNot a new report edition.
  2. 6 October 2026 · Our checkPublic records reopened; no live transaction audited.
Read the full diagram explanation
  1. The report is cited as 2018. The public abstract is accessible but the PDF is restricted.
  2. The final Rahn PDF prints issuance on 18 July 2018; BNM’s register and announcement list 19 July 2018. It is generally effective 1 August 2019; paragraph 33 took effect immediately on issuance.
  3. The repository deposit and update date is 17 December 2019. The editorial source access date is 6 October 2026. Neither changes the research publication year.
The 2018 research year, policy commencement and repository deposit are separate events. Access in 2026 does not update the report’s conclusions. 2018 report: public repository abstract · Rahn policy document · Banking policy register

Read the comparisons carefully

In this discussion, a fixed charge concerns identified assets; a floating charge concerns a changing asset pool. The abstract finds fixed charges closer to traditional rahn (an asset pledge supporting an obligation). Its preferred Mālikī view tolerates floating-charge uncertainty, while recording other juristic objections. This is an attributed research preference. 2018 report: public repository abstract

Quasi-security means arrangements serving a security function without simply being the same asset pledge. The abstract includes debentures, indemnities or guarantees and assignments. It compares some guarantee and assignment arrangements with kafālah/ḍamān and ḥawālah, without equating the contracts. 2018 report: public repository abstract

Here, “charge” means a security interest, not a service fee. “Book debts” are receivables recorded as amounts owed to a business, not the business’s books or its borrowings. “Intellectual property” means rights such as a patent or copyright, not the physical book or machine alone. 2018 report: public repository abstract · What is intellectual property?

Figure 3 · 2018 abstract + editorial questions

An asset name is only the start

Shares

  1. Research positionExclude a non-compliant core business; mixed activity requires exclusion of the prohibited portion.
  2. Ask for evidenceWhich share, screening basis and recognised collateral value?

Book debts and deposits

  1. Research positionResearchers accept book debts on a constructive-possession rationale; conventional fixed deposits are limited to principal.
  2. Ask for evidenceWhich receivables are recorded, controlled and collectible? Which amount excludes interest?

Intellectual property

  1. Research positionPossible collateral if the security agreement contains sufficient clear information.
  2. Ask for evidenceWhich registered or enforceable rights, owner and valuation?
Read the full diagram explanation
  1. The abstract distinguishes shares whose core business is non-compliant from mixed-activity shares, where it excludes the prohibited portion.
  2. It accepts book debts using registration as constructive possession, and limits conventional fixed-deposit collateral to principal.
  3. It considers intellectual property possible collateral with a sufficiently clear security agreement. The accompanying verification questions are editorial additions, not report findings.
These are attributed research positions, followed by new questions to ask. No asset here has been individually approved. 2018 report: public repository abstract

Use the regulator’s document for its own scope

Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM)’s final Rahn policy remains linked in its banking register at this check. It applies to defined Islamic financial institutions using rahn. The policy recognises third-party collateral with consent and possible future-owned assets; its asset-value conditions are its own requirements. They must not be replaced with a blanket reading of the report’s historical asset conclusions. Rahn policy document · Banking policy register

For example, BNM §14.2 distinguishes mixed financial assets, requiring a compliant core business, from non-compliant financial assets, for which recognised collateral value is restricted to principal. Read the actual category, surrounding conditions and institution’s agreement. This is not an editorial ruling on a named share, deposit or bond. Rahn policy document

A Malaysian example and questions before signing

Fictional example: a Malaysian furniture company seeks financing. The bank asks about a named machine, changing stock and customer invoices. This page provides vocabulary for the discussion; it cannot tell the company which security will be accepted or what its recovery value is. A family member offering an asset also needs to understand whose debt it secures.

Muslim readers may seek a Shariah explanation as well as clear legal rights. Non-Muslim readers can use the same contract questions. This research record establishes no religious eligibility rule for a bank product. Ask the actual provider who can apply and who can pledge an asset.

  • Request the facility agreement, security documents and current Product Disclosure Sheet, where supplied. Identify the owner, obligor and creditor separately.
  • Ask which assets are covered now, whether future or replacement assets enter the pool, and how disposal, substitution and release work.
  • Request all applicable legal, registration, valuation, custody and enforcement charges, plus financing/profit costs and any protection costs. No tariff or fee exemption is established here.
  • Ask about notice, valuation, sale, recovery priority, surplus and any remaining unpaid obligation. Get the applicable clauses; do not infer the answer from “secured”.
  • Ask who checks asset compliance as a pool changes, and which current regulator requirements and qualified advice apply.

Three misunderstandings to avoid

  • “There is collateral, so the financing is risk-free.” Security does not establish your ability to pay or a fixed sale value.
  • “A guarantee is the same as pledging an asset.” Compare the actual promise, asset rights and responsible person.
  • “The report prefers a view, so every bank must accept my asset.” A historical research conclusion is not an offer, current legal opinion or transaction approval.

References

  1. 2018 report: public repository abstractInternational Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) Repository; report publisher ISRACitation; Abstract paragraphs 1–14; access and deposit fieldsPublication/version: 2018. Effective: not applicable / not stated. Accessed 6 October 2026.PDF listed as Published Version, restricted to registered users. Public abstract read; full report, edition, ISBN and exact publication day not inspected. Deposit/update 17 December 2019 is not publication.
  2. Rahn policy documentBank Negara MalaysiaCover; §§2.1, 4.1, 5.2, 8.1, 9.2, 13, 14.2–14.5; printed pp.1–6Printed issuance: 18 July 2018 (BNM/RH/PD 028-79). Announcement/register: 19 July 2018. Generally effective 1 August 2019; §33 immediately on issuance. Accessed 6 October 2026.Applicable to defined IFIs using rahn; not every lender. Retrieved final policy is a regulatory reference, not verification of a selected asset, product or security agreement.
  3. Banking policy registerBank Negara MalaysiaRahn entry dated 19 July 2018Publication/version: not stated. Effective: not applicable / not stated. Accessed 6 October 2026.Register rechecked on access date; retained entry is not a legal opinion that no other instrument affects a transaction.
  4. What is intellectual property?World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)What is IP?; Types of intellectual property: patents and copyrightUndated explanatory page; accessed 6 October 2026.General glossary only; no Malaysian title, valuation or security enforceability established.
Independent editorial explanation. No institutional endorsement or qualified human legal/Shariah approval is claimed.

Related reading

Islamic home financing: compare the contract and total costGold accounts and ar-rahnu: ownership, spreads and collateralWhat is Islamic finance? Start with everyday money decisions

Search

Search guides, glossary entries, research and publications in English.